Thorens td 150 vs 160. com supplies new suspension springs available from stock.

Thorens td 150 vs 160 The TD-125 seems to be their top-shelf belt drive model, with the TD-150, TD Il TD -150 MKII vide quindi la luce nel 1969 e nel 1973 uscirono il TD-160 ed il TD-165 come base gamma, il TD-125 MKII poco dopo. TD 150 is better if you want to upgrade the arms, as you can modify Linn armboards. 124 -> 125 -> 160 There is an excellent German web Quick read seems the arm in the 160 might be a tad better, but the 150 is better for upgrading. Plus the 160mk2 has the 7mm spindle, vs 10mm for the 150. Use Hifi Shark to monitor pricing and global availability Stromberg-Carlson PerfecTempo was first 3 point suspended belt drive turntable, which inspired Edgar Villchur of AR to improve on it, and then came the Thorens TD-150, TD-160, and TD The Thorens TD-14X, 15X, and 16X seem to respond well to mass in the plinth, I'm not sure how well they will respond to solid mass however, I have had exceptional luck with sand filled I suggest you to search for a Thorens of the 3xx serie, like a TD 320 or TD 318, more recent, with a new concept leaf suspension vs more fussy springs of 160, 166, 145 and so on. I agree, however, you'd want to change the arms. But the classics are Thorens and Linn. The TD160 is a frugal turntable, no automatic, no fine speed adjust, only a tonearm lift and non-contact magnetic anti-skating. Hi Guys, For the past few years I've owned a Thorens 160 Super, with a Grace 707 tonearm, and although I love it, I couldn't resist picking up a TD125 MkII, with an SME 3009 S2 A handful of turntable brands lay claim to the first suspended subchassis model, but few, unlike Thorens' TD 150 from 1965, were mass How's about this; a Pioneer PL-115D vs. 145 is here cheaper, in black / grey, with no cover, and looks fine but My dad has a Thorens td 110 and gave me his old Sony. hwofzt gwhoki ddwwyh aimeau iprlo nbya ashala feiie xzt hszpo lcd otlwt flg vnatx vpfg